And yet the number of projects with similarly insignificant costs is large, and they do add up.
The argument cannot be "this money doesn't matter", it has to be "this represents good value for money" (imo)
The argument cannot be "this money doesn't matter", it has to be "this represents good value for money" (imo)
Departments like the EPA are so small that they have to be put in the “other” umbrella that makes up 1% of federal spending (go to the Agency tab):
https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/feder...
Stephen Few, “Save the Pies for Dessert” (https://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/visual_business_inte...)
Edward Tufte, “The only worse design than a pie chart is several of them.”
The “1% other” is more compelling.
Wouldn't you say this archive represents good value for the money?
A nation that forgets its past is a nation that repeats its mistakes.
Yes, that's the point. Not "this is so cheap it's irrelevant" but "this is an important resource worth funding".