So, what I heard was "No, and here is a good reason it should be 'yes, some'."
> does this update your priors significantly in the direction of P=NP?
My answer is no ... and Aaronson's answer would also be no ... clearly he doesn't view a change from 3% to 5% to be significant ... his response downplayed the significance of !ETH in re NP?=P. So apparently you downvoted me for simply stating my own opinion while you completely misunderstood what it was an opinion of.
Anyway, 3% is very very clearly distinguishable from 0% and so is 5%.