Hacker News Reader

MVC is still a general way of structuring code. Would it be the only way a MVC framework could or should be implemented for ASP.NET?

That's an argument against any descriptive name at all.

Not any descriptive name at all, but any name only partially descriptive, where the omitted information leads to confusion.

The fully descriptive name should be "MS implementation of the MVC pattern for the ASP.NET framework".