Consider this scenario. A friend of yours walks up to you and says "man, I got a ticket yesterday." You will have a general idea of the level of enforcement involved, how that's looked at by the government and others, etc. You probably do not see your friend as a criminal.
Now, suppose the same friend walked up and says "man, I got arrested yesterday, I just got bailed out." You will have different ideas of the enforcement model and perceptions of that. There is now a greater probability that you see your friend as a criminal.
Do you have an example that is not isolated incidents?
And your response is....weird? It is as if there is nothing at the bottom of these (your) arguments. You poke a finger and it comes out of the other end..
It’s a sleight of hand, they say “the worst of the worst” and what they mean is “all immigrants (not just the illegal ones) are the worst of the worst”
This is why they’re going to lose their majorities next week.
It is not their home if they were occupying it illegally! What are you people smoking!?
If you find someone else living in your house when you came back after a long vacation, would you let them stay "for a while" out of compassion?
Yea, thought so.
Give a straight answer ffs!
The question is if you would want them removed from your house/premises. Not if you want to punish them.
There are two axes here: whether something is a punishment, whether it's deserved. You've moved from arguing it's not a punishment to arguing it's deserved. So you need to give a straight answer.
Anyway, your posts have too many exclamation points and curses, so I don't want to engage anymore. Have a nice day.
>There are two axes here: whether something is a punishment, whether it's deserved.
There is no punishment in the picture at all. YOU want it to be in the picture because that is something you can outrage on.
>Anyway, your posts have too many exclamation points and curses, so I don't want to engage anymore. Have a nice day.
Sure. Stop responding. Have a very nice day.