Thank you for proving my point.
One (emacs) gets millions in donations via the FSF and the other get little to no money or donations for being "free software" from the start despite both of them being "free software".
[0] https://github.com/herdrdev/herdr/blob/a57b97285c3308fbdcc16...
But for Herdr specifically? Probably not. There are tons of similar free alternatives and even vibe coding your own is very easy with all the open source code of both herdr and all the alternatives available.
That is not the question I am asking.
> But for Herdr specifically? Probably not.
So no then.
That is why they went for VC money since the author knew that donations weren't enough to maintain it in the open.
> There are tons of similar free alternatives and even vibe coding your own is very easy with all the open source code of both herdr and all the alternatives available.
Why would I waste tokens vibe coding something that would go unmaintained in 6 months (because it is "free") over a properly funded project that will last much longer than that?
The cost of maintenance is never "free".
Herdr is...open source? and is also compatible with the free software principles. So where is the "lock in"?
You have not answered how will Herdr (and others) fund themselves to maintain the project without some form of sustainable funding without VC funding?
Not that I support VC funding per se, but without meaningful donations to support the maintainers, this is usually what they end up doing.