Hacker News Reader

How? Just let the lender get screwed, don't lenders have some risk after all?

What's your logic here?

Why not let Binance "get screwed"? How is the lender more "at fault" in your view?

If you are willing to accept an asset as collateral that can be frozen, then the onus is on you as the lender to take some steps to Know who Your possible Customers are.

Funny how the same argument can apply about the customers of Binance - if you are willing to accept to keep your funds in the hands of an unregulated third party which has a disclaimer at the top of the page saying "Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest.", then the onus is on you if you lose your money

Sounds fair to you?

Yes, I think if you trust Binance with anything in 2026 then you deserve to lose all your money.

So you want the stablecoin corporations to screw the people that lent the money and you say the people that had money in Binance should lose as well

What kind of backwards Robinhood steal-from-people-to-give-to-Binance are you?

I guess I should be clear that I expect everything related to the blockchain to burn and have no sympathy for any actors.

Wow, that's a strong position against some people for pushing some numbers on the screen

I own no crypto myself and hold no grudge against crypto people

Did they hurt you or something?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com