If an employee is getting their work done, with or without AI, why does it matter? Is it just the idea that if an employee is keeping up, without using AI, how much work could they get done if they were?
If they’re coming to market when there’s already a dominant player, they must have improved something, right? Not saying it’s logical.
Usually that would be fine if reporting lines were healthy, but in the AI age with top-down mandates they're not.