Incidentally, the author (Conrad Barski) says in that discussion that Clojure is his favorite Lisp now and he finds it much more elegant than Common Lisp. I have a similar background (CL programming, now doing Clojure) and I agree.
For production code, I ended up abandoning Common Lisp for the most part in favor of Racket, simply because of its library support and compatible, scoped dialects, but the principles are the same in either case. I'd actually recommend starting with something less 'batteries included' if you have the patience, because it makes it easier to see the fundamental beauty of the language, without getting distracted by something as "irrelevant" as library support.
Some people say that Land of Lisp makes it hard to develop 'useful' applications afterwards, but for that, I think Practical Common Lisp is a good secondary resource, and it's easy to skim once you've completed Land of Lisp. Land of Lisp is much better as "Lisp Propaganda" - ie, for someone who's interested in giving it a shot, it does a good job of selling the Lisp paradigm as a whole philosophy, even if it doesn't have space to cover all of its practical uses[0].
[0] I won't sell it short, though - it does a good job for that too... several of the games it implements are non-trivial.