Hacker News Reader

Is this supposed to be clever? Their assets serve their business (you know ... like any normal company) and that business is selling tokens.

Companies are frequently acquired for reasons outside their core business, but rather other assets and value they hold.

Is knowing that and pointing it out particularly clever? I wouldn't have thought so.

> Companies are frequently acquired for reasons outside their core business

true

> but rather other assets and value they hold.

true

> [anthropic has assets which are valuable to apple]

does not follow

That's not a logical leap I was inferring. It's a scarecrow argument you are making because I refuted:

> There is absolutely no timeline where Apple acquires any token provider because Apple doesn't sell tokens.

Apple not "selling tokens" doesn't preclude them from purchasing a company that does.

You can delete your comments, IDC. But I'm no longer responding to you so your dick will be left swinging in the breeze for all to see.