PayPal Assault On File-Sharing Sites Makes Business Case For Bitcoin
forbes.com
forbes.com
Indeed, I'll pin a time table on it. At the current growth rate, within 24 months the first calls to outlaw bitcoin will echo from some Senator or House member's office in DC. It'll lead to blanket legislation targeting bitcoin and any similar services that could exist in the future.
To be clear, you're predicting legislation that actually passes, rather than just being thrown around? Suppose that calls to outlaw bitcoin come in the next 24 months, but then it doesn't get put into a bill, or it gets put into one or more bills that don't get passed - how long would it be before you'd say this prediction was wrong?
Given that Citizens United held that money is speech, it seems there would be an obvious first amendment challenge to such a law. Not that I'd expect equal legal treatment for corporate super-PACs and a bunch of scruffy hackers.
Bitcoin is doing very well. MtGox has ~300K USD being exchanged every day - that's at least that much worth of transactions in BTC (might be more depending on the rate bitcoins are recirculated). There are a LOT of different things one can buy with it. There's a real, boring, everyday economy going on. The value has doubled in the past year - there was a 40% drop in Aug12, but it recovered a third of that the very next day and since then has steadily grown back to that high. It's not bullion or anything, but neither is it crazy: in fact it's been a bit boring, and that's a very good thing in a currency.
Smartphones are slowly taking over the world, as once they're as common as featurephones are now - say 5 years tops? - bitcoin becomes very useful in economies without proper banking systems, which is to say a whole lot of them!
Even if the US manages to outlaw it, it's hard to see how they can stop it.
EDIT: http://blockchain.info/charts/output-volume suggests total transactions are 1.9M BTC, which would be 27M USD, per day. Wowsers.
Permanently banning legitimate businesses and bitcoin exchanges/banks from accepting coins from 'tainted' wallets that have received these transactions (as well as parent and grandparent wallets).
I accept that there are use cases when this isn't a problem, but being able to transfer wealth from one currency to another is a feature that a lot of successful currencies have.
Deep packet inspection could be used to locate people who send bitcoin transactions (by default transactions are far from anonymous). Offline seizure could be used to prove large wallets illegality (e.g. if they tracked down silk road owners). There are plenty of algorithms that can infer people you might know based on your FB friends friends, I'm sure they can be easily applied to transactions.
People don't seem to understand that it's very easy to kill bitcoin, the same way they killed online gambling in the U.S.: make it illegal to transfer money to bitcoin exchanges or to financial institutions known to violate these regulations. This would kill all the legitimate exchanges and essentially prevent legitimate users from using bitcoin. This solution also has the advantage of being jurisdiction agnostic; the rules would apply only to US banks (or if such laws are issued by the EU, to EU banks) or to other financial institutions operating in the U.S. or with U.S. customers. It's also (relatively) trivial to implement such a blacklist--financial institutions can act on a dime if jail time is at stake.
Like hemp and alcohol?
What happens when people don't need to "buy" money with their bitcoins and just use it for goods?
In reality, it'll probably be outlawed in the US as a money laundering system.
No, online gambling was hardly "killed" in the US: the illegal annual market is estimated to be $4-6 billion [1]! Similarly, Bitcoin would not be "killed" by declaring it illegal, it would most likely continue to prosper like online gambling.
"This would kill all the legitimate exchanges and essentially prevent legitimate users from using bitcoin"
I don't think so. There are many other ways to acquire bitcoins: you can sell goods/services in exchange of coins, you can mine, you can buy them from a friend in cash, etc.
[1] http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-01-03/bitcoin-maki...
http://howdoyoubuybitcoins.com/in/united-states/
Hope it's helpful. Please let me know if it can be improved.
I think it'll get there however, with larger adoption.
BitMe.com lets you deposit cash at any Chase branch for free, and you can take money out via ACH for 25 cents.
All of the ways you suggest are fine for small amounts, but if you are trying to move thousands of dollars into BTC, percentage-based fees matter.
http://www.bitcoinstore.com/ http://bitcoincoffee.com/ http://www.bitcoinin.com/ http://www.bitcoinblaster.com/ http://www.bitmit.net/en/recent (like eBay for BTC)
There's a bunch more out there (and growing), that's just a starter list.
There's also a whole bunch of gambling sites (surprise) which will take BTC now.
I think Bitcoin will take over all online gambling sites, then all Usenet sites, it will become the go-to currency for all virtual good buying/selling, and now all private torrent trackers, all they need is someone like Wikipedia or Reddit to start accepting BTC and it's game over, I think.
I haven't heard about any ISP accepting it.
For that matter, anyone who trusts PayPal is foolish. Keeping money in a PP account is a great way to lose it.