Hacker News Reader

> Companies are frequently acquired for reasons outside their core business

true

> but rather other assets and value they hold.

true

> [anthropic has assets which are valuable to apple]

does not follow

That's not a logical leap I was inferring. It's a scarecrow argument you are making because I refuted:

> There is absolutely no timeline where Apple acquires any token provider because Apple doesn't sell tokens.

Apple not "selling tokens" doesn't preclude them from purchasing a company that does.

You can delete your comments, IDC. But I'm no longer responding to you so your dick will be left swinging in the breeze for all to see.