Seoul Viosys begins production of rare-earth-free white light emitter
semiconductor-today.com
semiconductor-today.com
Gallium might be a problem. "China accounted for 99% of worldwide primary low-purity gallium production. The remaining primary low-purity gallium producers outside of China included Japan and Russia. Germany, Hungary, and Kazakhstan ceased primary production in 2016, 2015, and 2013, respectively. Ukraine most likely ceased primary production in 2022. Several new gallium production projects were announced including those in Australia, Canada, Greece, Kazakhstan, and the Republic of Korea."[1]
The price of gallium has increased by a factor of 10 in the last 10 years. It's doubled since last year.[2] A huge new demand for gallium is going to be a problem.
[1] https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026-gallium.pd...
Yes mostly. The West outsourced this market due to heavy environmental and financial costs of extracting it. It’s sort of the same story as for a lot of the rare earth elements.
https://payneinstitute.mines.edu/strategic-intervention-to-r...
> China produces approximately 98% of the global gallium supply and 88% of the global germanium supply; dominance has been fueled by government intervention. Beijing mandated its rapidly expanding aluminum producers to install the capacity to extract gallium. Between 2005 and 2015, China’s production of low-purity gallium surged from 22 metric tons to 444 metric tons, a nearly 2000 percent increase. This move flooded the market and forced producers in the United Kingdom, Germany, Hungary, and Kazakhstan to shutter their operations.
https://www.riotinto.com/en/news/releases/2026/rio-tinto-adv...
The problem with outsourcing all your manufacturing so you can mildly increase profits and destroy any organized labor is that whoever you outsourced it to holds you hostage.
Any talk of this is just propaganda to sell weapons and increase the "defense" budget.
So gallium is a byproduct of bauxite mining but requires some sophistication. China produces 60% of the world's aluminum. India is the second largest producer but doesn't have the infrastructure to extract gallium. That will probably change. But it is a sophisticated process so you need an entire supply chain for that too. China has that. India does not (currently).
But India would avoid the geopolitical issues of being dependent on China or Russia.
This is almost the exact same argument that was used to justify economic cooperation with Russia, they’d never start a war in Europe because their economy would collapse!
Ooos.
Also we read the warning as "don't buy from them, rather buy from us".
And it was extensivly debated in general.
The EU kept at it with plans to expand until the war started for the second time and “someone” took it upon themselves to violently sever that link.
Now at latest by 2014 that should have changed indeed. But even then different approaches would have been possible then cutting all ties and hope this will work out better.
After Reagan's election in 1980 the US tried very hard to slow and/or block the creation of the Urengoy–Pomary–Uzhhorod (Trans-Siberian) pipeline when it started imposing sanctions on the USSR after it declared martial law in Poland. German president Schroeder had agreed to the pipeline in 1980.
The US imposed export controls on technical equipment used for building that pipeline. It urged European governments not to build the pipeline, it then expanded the embargo to all global subsidiaries of US companies and anyone with licenses with US firms. The US even allegedly created dummy plans for covert defective pipeline equipment and leaked those plans resulting in a trans siberean pipeline explosion that delayed the project. (Some claim the explosion was caused by bad construction techniques and/or was just a psyop.)
All this to pressure the Russian economy which was not in good shape and for whom the pipeline would have been an economic lifeline for the USSR. The Europeans, wanting to reduce middle eastern dependence on oil persisted and eventually got the US to rollback the global sanctions in return for other forms of sanctions. Peter Schweitzer wrote about this as early as his 1994 book "Victory" but there are various others who have covered it since. The pipeline started shipping oil to the French in 1984 despite all that. The US started its pipeline focus rather late in part because it did nothing under Carter, but the energy dependence it helped lock in was a major, major bone of contention in the early 80s between the US and Europe.
I'm no fan of Donald Trump but this was one of his rare Ws. At a NATO summit in 2018, he warned Europe about the dangers of dependency on Russian energy and basically bullied Germany into building an LNG plant, something that was critical to Europe after Russia invaded Ukraine 4 years later [1].
Biden as Vice President to Obama warned Europe of the same thing in 2016 [2] regarding Nord Stream 2.
So American administrations have consistently and repeatedly warned Europe about the dangers over 6+ years. So how can anyone argue that "[Russia would] never start a war in Europe" when the US said basically that?
[2]: https://www.dw.com/en/biden-warns-europe-against-dependency-...
Hilariously not any organized labor, just the local group. The largest organized labor group in the history of the world is alive and well, and is headquartered in Beijing.
This was basically just a case of kicking the can down the road really hard. The can is still there, waiting for you, and you are now completely dependent on it (oh and it has nuclear weapons).
> The problem with outsourcing all your manufacturing
Not having a war is a good thing, not a problem.
They are two separate countries now, unless you think North/South Korea are the same, Russia/Ukraine, etc.
No, they are not. The US legally recognized Taiwan (fka Formosa) as Chinese territory in 1943 and 1945 and legally recognized the PRC as the sole legal government of China in 1979, following a similar recognition by the UN in 1971.
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12503
There are only 11 countries in the world that recognize Taiwan as a sovereign entity and the largest are Guatemala, Haiti, and Paraguay.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_T...
It is de facto a country, not de jure, for obvious reasons. You can pretend otherwise, but what's the point in engaging in a discussion where you get to invent your own reality?
Macau hasn't caused as much of a ruckus, so they aren't being pushed as hard towards total integration.
Separate countries? All but ~10 countries on Earth including the US and all of Europe have what's come to be called the One China Policy. Taiwan is not recognized as an independent nation. It's really Schrodinger's nation, both independent and not at the same time and God forbid anybody opens the box and forces the issue.
De facto vs. de jure is what you're trying to describe, and I'm sticking with the practical one.
You should open a history book. Or two.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_Peo...
I find it hard to believe this comment was made in good faith.
Korea? China ended up getting involved to support the North Korean government so China (and the USSR) didn't have a US client state on their border.
Laos? This was bad because China supported the Khmer Rouge.
Vietnam? Military assistance to the North Vietnam government to resist a US imperialist invasion. Did China invade? No. Do they occupy it now? No.
The rest are basically just minor border disputes with Vietnam, Burma, India, etc. And China hasn't really been involved in any foreign military action since 1979, 47 years ago. I'll stack that up against the US in particular as well as the European colonial powers (even in modern times).
That depends on whether you consider Marxist concentration camps to be slavery or not.
Rinse, Repeat.
When exactly has this been "rinse. repeated"ed since?
Sounds like all the more reason for china to start a war.
Just having one side dependent isn't going to stop war.
Here they are somehow eliminating the need for phosphors for color conversion but they didn't say how.
I mean, if GaN is a problem we are already in a bad shape.
CIE's R96a (1999) remains stuck in a disagreement between scientists and manufacturers. This means that lights currently specified with a CRI value are advertising an inaccurate measure of their ability to reveal the color of objects.
A very good CRI does not guarantee a very good color reproduction, but a poor CRI guarantees a bad color reproduction.
That could be done if the LED actually contains a multiple structure combining red, green and blue LEDs, but in the past such a combined LED had the disadvantage that in time the efficiency of the 3 components degraded at a different rate, which resulted in a color shift.
For now, the luminous efficiency of this LED is quite poor, unsuitable for lighting but only for indicator LEDs or display applications, but they claim that for such small LEDs even the traditional LEDs had poor efficiency and they hope to improve the efficiency later to more acceptable levels.
But the press release does not have any information about this, so the peaks could also be narrow, resulting in a poor CRI.
Could this be like nanostructure based? Like nanoscale etching that messes with the light, created on top of UV LEDs?
If they do not use a multiple LED structure but they still have a fluorescent conversion layer, the layer must be very thin and deposited on the top surface of the LED. It could consist of "quantum dots", like in some TV panels, i.e. very small crystals which emit light of a color depending on the composition and size of the nanocrystal when illuminated with ultraviolet or blue light.
However, "quantum dot" is a term that has already been used for a long time in marketing with the intention to suggest a superior technology. If they were using this, I expect that they would have bragged about it.
So from the wording of the press release I think that a multiple LED structure is more likely than a "quantum dot" conversion layer, even if the latter would provide both a better spectrum coverage and superior aging characteristics (by avoiding a color hue shift in old LEDs).
https://compoundsemiconductor.net/article/114125/Realising_red_GaN-based_microLEDs_with_europium-doping
https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/123/16/160901/400705/Perspective-Toward-efficient-GaN-based-red-light
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Color-online-a-Schematic-of-an-InGaN-based-red-LED-epitaxial-structure-b_fig1_355092457
https://www.tytlabs.co.jp/en/english/review/rev402epdf/e402_007kato.pdfI imagine this is like 20 years away from hitting consumer design, but I bet it'll be used for some cool stuff.
Where you really need white light with a continuous spectrum, there are very few alternatives to arc lamps.
Some time ago there were published some interesting research results, which suggested that it is possible for incandescent lamps to make a comeback, this time at a efficiency comparable with white LEDs. That could be achieved with a carbon filament in a gas mixture that prevents evaporation, where all the inner walls of the lamp are very good mirrors for infrared light, but the front window of the lamp has an optical filter that passes visible light, while reflecting infrared light.
Such an incandescent lamp could have a much better efficiency than an arc lamp, and also a longer life (the very low efficiency of the traditional incandescent lamps is due to most of the energy being lost as infrared light).
It remains to be seen whether that research can lead to commercial products.
Can someone who is an expert on the topic comment about if the statement regarding AI is true and if so then by how much (and how big/small of a problem it is), or if the Company is suggesting it out of pure hype of AI mania.
> Market research firm Omdia projects that the micro LED display market revenue will grow from $10.54 million this year to approximately $6.8 billion by 2032, particularly in applications for smart glasses and ultra-small displays.
> The WICOP technology involves directly mounting LED chips onto substrates without separate wires or packaging. Seoul Semiconductor and Seoul Biosys have been developing ultraviolet (UV), blue, green, red, and infrared (IR) micro LEDs based on this technology, and have now expanded its application to include white light.
Fascinating results nonetheless even discounting AI use. Having half the price is insane, also 10.54 million seems incredibly small and 6.8 Billion is a little insane. Kinda wild to see such massive growth expected in such short amount of time.
> if the Company is suggesting it out of pure hype of AI mania.
IMHO, this is pretty transparently r&d for better? data transmission attached to the trend of the day that does a lot of data transmission. Where better is higher bandwidth, lower cost, etc.
AI is the current trendy thing, but better data transmission will always have applications.
One of the pitches was for a fairly good nonprofit service. I thought it was a good idea. Sort of a "help people that help people" thing. I can dig that.
At the very end of the pitch, the last thing the young lady said, was "And we're looking at implementing blockchain technology in our service."
I don't remember exactly what the service was, but it clearly had no applications for distributed-key tech.
I think it probably cost her the backing. No one was fooled. I think someone told her that she had to mention blockchain, somewhere.
Looks like the innovation here is the multi-wavelength LED, some kind of multiple-quantum-well thing maybe?
See also the other comments here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50328023 V/F doesn't really exist in Korean and B equivalent in latin character/ English sound gets used instead.
And many Korean legitimate news sites use AI to translate their articles to English (and other languages).
Never heard of Ajupress, but they seem legitimate based on short research. More than this semi conductor today site I'd say. The news site being Korean, would think they're way more likely to be the original source, which then got picked up by the semi conductor site.
This is their original article, in Korean, if you prefer original sources, in their respective language: https://www.ajunews.com/view/20261028171303299