Hacker News Reader

Your reading skills are commendable, especially since you "found" an assertion of future impossibility. Me having explicitly mentioned the future as "up for debate" makes your reading comprehension even more impressive.

Unable to see the architectural problem mentioned is just icing on the cake.

How do you do this?

View on HN

Here let me point you to the assertion you made:

>> Its not happening, at least not with LLMs

> Correct.

Wrong. The entire arc was on database and novel architectures. Let me point you to the things you missed both on the example and the context.

>> Writing such a complex software as database engine requires strategy, awareness and rigor.

> Correct. Current LLMs are pathetic at architectural correctness without expert supervision at every turn.

> Try having a discussion on designing an architecture for a new kv engine with cache-oblivious algorithms that beats lmdb on generic random point-key lookups on a disk-backed mmap file.

> What happens in the future is up for debate,

Reply on news.ycombinator.com