The future in old computer magazines (1984–2004)
tomorrowasusual.substack.com
tomorrowasusual.substack.com
Once the future is being designed by CEOs of corporations the value-extracting machine creates the worst of possible futures.
We need to redistribute wealth back to the working class and let us decide a better future. With the current concentration of money and power in a few hands our only future is to repeat the middle ages.
They mistake the temporary shape of today's society for some unstoppable force of nature, and imagine their success to be proof of superiority. I hope they realize that neither are true before people become truly desperate.
This is a bit more difficult in the modern world. If a Chinese CEO, for example, is ruining the world he's going to be very difficult for me to eat.
Also with a modern governments ability to monitor all your actions it may be very difficult to rise up without getting noticed and disappeared almost instantly. "The USSR brought to you by Flock".
The only social contract the vastly wealthy will remember is that the plebs must respect their private property rights as a divine right, in return they'll give the plebs the opportunity to work...sometimes.
We argue of politics, over why someone's opinion on the other side of the planet is wrong. We gawk at celebrities with terrible personalities and surgically or digitally amplified talent. We spend billions on bad movies with terrible plots that never correlate to or make us think about our own lives. We envision ourselves wealthy and beloved and poised to be greater than the greatest of all time, and we do this all while constantly being driven to work harder, output more, find new ways to make money so that we might have more for ourselves, never really considering how much we make for others and how much we are being completely and totally used until we are wrung dry and discarded by the very world we gave everything to.
We all think a small life is worthless, when it's the only thing we have.
The modern connected world drags you into a much bigger life than our monkey brains can handle.
And just ignoring shit doesn't fix the problem either.
It's a mess.
I don't disagree that it was better / less soul-sucking in the past, but I think that's because there was a lot less money in it, so participants in the software industry were in it because they were passionate. Unfortunately, corporatization is necessary to scale.
I'm sure you can find industries today which are largely driven by passionate people working in small outfits (but there's probably not much money in it).
Scale is the issue. You get one or two products that monopolize all the thought on issues with many different interpretations leading to monocultures.
If it were just one country you could break large businesses up, but when other nation states allow it, it gets messy to compete in markets.
Of course, there are outliers who use tech individually to improve the human/world experience, but it isn't the norm.
Thiel's dream
This article had a huge impact on my life and my optimistic outlook on what the future would hold.
[1]: https://www.popsci.com/popular-science-breslin-home-computer...
We got everything but we killed the fun.
You don't even need to rely on a single centralised corporate search engine for all your information look-up. 10 years ago, it would have been unimaginable that you could self-host something that could actually replace or be better than Google.
As a side note, and border topic, it reminds me of the "My Uncle" (Mon Oncle) sequence of the Villa Arpel from Jacques Tati (who had the finesse to observe the paradoxes of society's evolution).
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuGA4ZNSS8c>
The fountain that switches on when important people get in and switches off when house employees walk by (in order to economize water), the automatic garage door designed like no one would ever need any security switch, the geometric garden where the characters end up walking awkwardly.
ps: I remember seeing those ads in another article. FWIW.
It was more space, robotics, vehicles—less about appliances, the home…
I have asked in this forum if anyone could write scanning software that recognized images as images and rendered them well, and at the same time, recognized text areas, and threshholded them 0-100%.
When I must, I run a page through GIMP and do the above.
Alternatively, I run a pdf through Apple Preview.app, sometimes darkening it (Export -- lessen brightness Quartz filter) so that the next step, (Export -- black and white Quartz filter) will work well.
Images are trashed this way, so I then open up the original and the threshholded pdf's in "contact sheet" view, and swap images for the corresponding blackened-out pages.)
SWELL. It only is worthwhile when a pdf has few images, typically the cover. Line drawings do well in this scenario.
Of course, I prefer free and open source.
Which I think is pretty impressive levels of prediction.
In reality these 2 went in opposite directions, clearly the speed of tech progress was underestimated and the kind of future economy was wrongly predicted. But hey, these were leisure magazines, who'd take them seriously.
We need something like Omni magazine to return. Something without the cynicism of Wired, but with sharp and stylish images that juxtapose the cool with the intellectual. The kind of thing that has slightly too cool booze ads and half naked people sitting next to interviews of Nobel prize winners and perhaps overly optimistic Science Fiction. We need dreams that are not just the seeds of new nightmares.
We usually get the future we dream of, and I'd like us all to start imagining it to be more like Star Trek and less like Black Mirror.
Be realistic - we've gone from "You, yes you, will be able to do an incredibly new and fun thing with Shiny New Technology™" to "You probably won't have a job or drinking water, your TV and phone are tracking you, all creative work is now worthless, the planet is on fire, AI may kill us all, but buy into our IPO anyway" in less than ten years.
In places that sucked in 1950 it's way better now.
In places that were good in 1950 it's pretty questionable if it's all that much better.
Birth rate has been going down since like 1910, so there is a lot more than just one thing causing it.