Hacker News Reader

Comment by bijowo1676 | Hacker News Reader

they were not gangsters during the soviet times, so its hardly an argument about them as persons. But rather a sign of decaying times (the fall of the USSR and the economic hardship).

Remember when the US had a hurricane somewhere in the South (Kathrina?), people just went looting all retail stores, same as what happened during BLM riots, the current riots in Paris, etc etc

View on HN

Of course there were gangsters in soviet times. Vory v zakone[0] in the 20s-30s, tsekhoviki[1] in the 60s-70s, with a brief period during and after WW2 where enough killed each other[2] not to be a major issue for a moment.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thief_in_law

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsekhovik

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitch_Wars

Of course soviet system had crime and violence. And these products of soviet system super blew up right after it fell, ceasing opportunity no matter who or what they harmed.

All societies have crime and prisons

nitpick, just so we keep a broad picture: most small-scale societies did not and do not have prisons

What is that supposed to mean in the context? Anyway:

> But rather a sign of decaying times (the fall of the USSR and the economic hardship).

Nope, people turned to crime, because it was available. You did not seen poor people turning to crime because of economic hardship, you have seen average people or people with money to turn to crime, because there was good crime opportunity.

BSABSVForPutin?

What I have to say about that since I live where it happened is that it only happened in certain localized places in the city

There is a stark difference between organized crime and everything else you listed.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com