> This felt very easy.
There's no right or wrong answers, so can it really be easy?
There's no right or wrong answers, so can it really be easy?
Otherwise it comes down to "is it a vehicle?" and "is it in the park?". There are comments from people saying they said that a police car or ambulance was not a vehicle in the park because it had a good reason to be there, which to me makes no sense at all.
The game makes very clear that it is not "would you allow this vehicle in the park?" but "is this a vehicle in the park?".
I don't think these are trivial questions at all. There's no sound definition of a vehicle.
If your definition depends on transporting humans than a wagon or even self-driving truck is not a vehicle. If your definition depends on transporting goods in a self-propelled manner than humans are vehicles.
The disagreement is that some people think a police car is not a vehicle in the park, because its presence in the park is justified.
> not everyone views a "justfied violation" as a subcategory of "violation", but rather as a subcategory of "not violation"
Seriously, I also think it was designed to not have right or wrong answers. I answered based on what I felt the spirit of the rule was - I.e., no Honda Civics. Apart from that, anything goes!
Edit: I know I said I was answering seriously for my second paragraph, but I really did think that the private vehicle example (someone’s Honda Civic) was as the only breach of the intended rule