ok, I'm just describing problems I haven't seen LLMs improving on for the last 4 years. These are important problems, and I'm not convinced a machine-generated ontology is the start of the answer to them.

Happy to admit relative ignorance of the internals and hear a more informed opinion, but it is not convincing to hear that they'll inevitably solve all the problems and we'll live in the best of all possible worlds next year, without hearing a proposal as to how they'd do that.

These machines are trained to be convincing and addictive, very similar to our social media platforms now, that leads to a lot of over-optimism about what they might be able to do one day, with the next frontier model.