You have a very shallow understanding of economics. "Less regulation" is great if you can't think beyond next quarter. "Good regulation" is what keeps the economy healthy long-term.
Perhaps, but that's not really relevant as I am not the stock market.
You may not be directly invested in the stock market but you will certainly feel the repercussions to the economy from a crash.
I am in the market. I am not the market myself, so my opinion on the efficacy of regulation is of little concern to the debate. One thing is clear though: the election of a deregulation candidate immediately makes market go up, and the inverse. That’s what’s being discussed here, wheee the OP says “must be corruption”.
Ideally markets should price rationally, unfortunately they are often driven by human-sentiments, exuberance or dejection.