A long way down the real story comes out. The filer of the report was trying to remotely patch a bunch of servers for CVEs, and a reboot after patch was part of the process.
* https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/59060#issuecomment-66...
The cost is that proper procedure now requires a full analysis of what was done to the server, instead of the desired patch and reboot.
* https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/59060#issuecomment-66...
Pretty much the only insightful comments were the one that said that non-AI tooling exists for this:
* https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/59060#issuecomment-66...
And the one pointing out the promises that 'AI' will handle mundane things that lead people to believe that they can give it rôte tasks to do:
* https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/59060#issuecomment-66...