Hacker News Reader

Comment by derektank | Hacker News Reader

Data centers in urban areas definitely see massive resistance. Seattle straight up banned any new data centers with a capacity over 20 MW, even though water is a non-issue, and we have tons of industrial land in the south of the city.

View on HN

Presumably because people don't want the cost of their energy to go up because a single company wants to come in and use half of the total capacity.

The problem is data centers produce absolutely colossal amounts of noise that can be heard and felt for miles. Even if water is a non-issue, the noise isn’t.

Neither is a problem in the sense that both noise and water consumption can be mitigated with some minor (relative to the total cost of a project) capital investments. If these were rational objections, states and municipalities could simply issue noise codes and water access caps, then let the companies figure out how to work within the lines. Instead, we’re left with blanket bans

This is actually a meme/fake videos on the internet, where they add random noise over their videos while recording a datacenter to make it seem really loud.

Realistically you can only hear it if you're within 30-50 feet of the data center, unless there's a separate diesel/natural gas generator.

No, it’s not the noise it’s the power consumption. Your locale becomes a power consumption hog so your off-peak hours and your peak hours become very similarly priced. Noise can be dampened, the power bill cannot.

95% of Seattle isn't "urban."

Put a data center next to BoAT, and nobody cares.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com