The fact Apple aren't embarrassed by the iOS keyboard is very surprising and disappointing.
Apple has been doing that for years:
- The iCloud Keychain API that lets Facebook, TikTok etc. track users across devices, app reinstalls and device resets.
- Ads in formerly ad-free built-in apps.
- Removing the Disable Javascript from Safari's menu so you can't easily disable the now-mandatory tracking bullshit on most sites.
- Ads
- "Force closing" apps on iOS not really force quitting them instantly anymore, giving each app a "last breath" chance to call home about anything it wants to send about you.
- Ads
- And now they've added nagging when you try to cancel recurring in-app subscriptions.
And I don't know enough about the keychain.
But removing the easy access button that breaks so many websites is not selling out users.
Giving an app some fraction of a second to clean up is not selling out users. This is a pretty ridiculous stretch on your part. If it had something to phone home it could have done it five seconds ago, why wait? Or it could probably do it the next time you open the app. That's not what the grace period is about.
Oh and did you notice how for several macOS versions the "Manage Website Data…" button in Safari Settings, for selectively removing cookies, magically fails to work?
Oh OH and how iCloud+'s paid Private Relay feature doesn't work in authoritarian countries like the UAE etc where it would actually be needed?
I didn't say they were, what the hell.
> Oh and did you notice
I did not notice. I don't use any Apple products.
You said that's not selling out users, because it was breaking websites if the users wanted to.
That is taking a feature [farther] away from [power] users,
in a move that favors other companies.
Apple is free to make their product work however they want. They're not creating laws or public utilities.
That's different than youtube demonetizing or suspending you because you said some word in a video.
Apple, evidently, does not want you to say these things. They can’t outright ban phrases due to optics, so they do this instead.
The middle ground here is to not suggest anything at all. Because they’re either pushing people to say something or preventing them from saying something.
The HN crowd forgets that average people don’t know how technology works. Everyone I know would see this as a good feature.
My rule of thumb in software is: if there's enough of a dispute on how something should work, it should probably turn into a preference available to users. It's adds scope, but it respects user choice in places where it matters.
I agree with you (on certain types of software), and I also don't see Apple as the be-all and end-all or assume that its opinions are always right. This is just my opinion based on my lived experience, both as a user and as an engineer.