> The one forced to do their work for them, are the teammates. Not the manager. The manager only care of it to be done. How it is done: doesn't matter.
I am happy for you that you weren't exposed to such managers.
What I've seen personally, together what some friends have told me and also what's here in HN (e.g. PR metrics from Anthropic, OpenAI, et al.).
The managers that swallowed the AI pill seemingly genuinely and non-ironically believe:
- 10x performance is possible now. Literally - 1 dev must do 10 developers work, also cross disciplinary. Dev will do full-stack: FE, BE, DBA, UI, UX, PM, you name it.
- Projects that have previously taken months of consideration, planning and development, now must be done in a week, by one person or at best very small team;
- Those managers don't have any tools how to measure performance - only tools are PR/commit counting mechanisms and shadow quotas of multiple hundreds PRs per week, that you will be remind of during next 1on1 or whatever;
- PR reviews? What reviews? Code quality/efficiency? What code quality/efficiency?
- Definition of done is ever changing. "You must do 10x slop", but by the end of the week "Why product looks like AI slop?". "Deliver project/task/feature", but by the end of the week "Why there's not every feature done that I could've thought of on the spot right this moment?";
Some even dared to say that asking questions to team-mates face to face is a waste of everyone's time, "just ask Claude instead". Though they will mandate return-to-office "to encourage collaboration" at the same time.