I mean if you run this as the usual social psychology experiment you already know what answer you'll get right? Pay 20 college students a couple bucks to review a set of texts, some human written, some AI written, and score how much they "liked" each text. Make the texts representative (ergo half the human texts are
fucking awful, all the AI texts are, well, AI texts), and there you go, evidence! People actually prefer AI writing!
Or, of course, make the human texts excellent blog posts that fit the readers' area of expertise and there you go, evidence! People hate AI writing! The HN hivemind was right all along!