As this rate of information production increases, this will become a full time job.
Obviously, this is not a full time job, and I think agents will fill in the "menial" work-load.
So interesting times ahead.
When was that not true? There are more books in the world that I want to read that the ones I can realistically (or even in the ideal case) be able to read. Magazines, newspapers, Youtube videos, ... AI has not changed anything.
Summarizing removes information. It is like just reading the titles instead of commenting on the content. Saves you time, but it is not the same.
And then on the purely integration scale, how do we even integrate this information as humans without being overwhelmed.
I think that it used to be really good 10 years ago, but SEO and such made that search worse combined with Google becoming a monopoly and stopping caring.
I don't have a good concept of how this can be solved at the moment.
Quite the opposite, IMHO. Opinions are cheap filler. They're like revision notes for Shakespeare's plays before an exam.
News, actual news, is important but expensive to gather and produce. Only a few agencies such as Reuters and AP actually work at that level.