Israel has set humanity back so far. All of the progress toward human rights that have developed since WWII have been shredded in favor of Zionism. They were mostly just an illusion but that illusion is gone.
No, this is an intentionally reductive framing. Palestinians are killed to realize the objectives of Zionism, which have shaped Israel since before its foundation. The entire country and its history are behind it, not just Netanyahu.
So maybe we should be dismantling the Murdoch empire.
Meanwhile the UN GA keeps screaming for 3 things:
1) for the ICC stay away from "internal affairs" (stuff happening in countries who haven't agreed to the treaty of Rome)
Even the Netherlands demanded the ICC stay away from the siege of Srebrenica (because a Dutch commander and deployment, "Dutchbat", oversaw the massacre they were there to prevent. The commander who oversaw this total disaster was promoted and knighted instead, and then de-knighted some years later) [1]
2) to convict Israel (Which has retreated from the treaty of Rome)
3) to convict Russia (which is guilty of crimes in Ukraine, which do fall under the treaty of Rome)
At least the Russia stuff is somewhat admirable. Until you start looking at what happens on the ground (gets to the UN SC, where Russia and China and sometimes France object to do anything to Russia, and of course the UN GA refuses to do anything for money reasons)
The UN, like it's predecessor the League of Nations, just does nothing. Worse: it is constantly used as an excuse to do nothing about serious situations, like currently Sudan, for example. The UN is a great ideal, a "world police", that countries DO NOT WANT, especially not dictatorships and muslim countries. And the organization is in practice constantly used as the exact opposite of the ideal it supposedly represents. The world, very much, does not want peace at this point, or at the very least you can say, it's not willing to give up any economic reward for peace, certainly not elsewhere. Of course, these days, the UN's predecessor (same buildings, same people), the League of Nations, is not just blamed for doing nothing, but was the organization behind the treaty of Versailles, now generally considered the cause of WW2, as it caused the decades-long economic disaster that remade the Weimar Republic into the third reich.
And when the UN does interfere, well, the last 3 places they interfered were Lebanon, Haiti, and Sudan. I wonder how things are going in those 3 places? The first one was "the Congo problem", Katanga in Congo in Africa. I wonder what happened there when the UN withdrew ...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutchbat
[2] the Dreyfus affair (which, by the way, is a particularly egregious instance of this happening as part of a systematic campaign to do so in France, not an isolated incident)
First, Palestine has terror organizations which it HAS to fight according to UN rules. Does it really even need to be stated that there's problems there? (no doubt it's all Israel's fault according to you, but ...)
Second, if territory is in dispute, even just in practice, ALL parties must agree. Neither party agrees (not even Hamas: they have very publicly declared they will never deliver anyone at all to the ICC). Palestine has made it very clear they're only interested in using the ICC to get sanctions on Israel, and consider everything they do internal affairs.
Third, the whole deal of the UN is that redrawing borders is not allowed, and if for any reason you do want to redraw borders, you need support of the whole UNSC. No change was ever accepted (not by Israel or Palestine either btw). Which has the result that according to the rules, there is no Palestinian territory (unless you mean Jordan).
Fourth, Palestine has accepted the treaty of Rome, then publicly declared, on TV, and on the internet, and ... that they were never going to respect it (never deliver anyone from their side to the ICC). The treaty of Rome states that unless a commitment is made, no complaint can be accepted.
I would add that Palestine is not exactly fighting on their own, and to put it mildly if they achieve any progress at all, the result will not be freedom for Palestinians. In other words, the whole conflict is a lie, and was from the very beginning. Nobody, least of all other muslims, are interested in helping Palestinians. They're interested in destroying "Israel" (but really Jews).
But these sorts of issues are a very common problem with the ICC. Russia is (well, was, given what happened last month) ALSO trying to use the ICC to get Zelensky convicted for human rights violations. And they're not the only one. UN members, even security council members are only interested in using the ICC as a weapon, and could not care less about any principle of justice. South Africa, also involved in the Israel/Palestine case, deliberately hosted Omar Al-Sharif, directly violating their ICC obligations. Venezuela has also declared that the ICC has no standing in Guyana, for example, because Guyana is really Venezuelan territory (a big piece with oil, I forgot the exact name). Mongolia hosted Putin, and even got a "guru" to put on a show advising Putin to use nuclear weapons ... As I pointed out, even the Netherlands destroyed an ICC persecution. The US ... and so on and so forth.