Hacker News Reader

Comment by munaf | Hacker News Reader

Just realized the title was misleading so I removed the word "render."

I don't think the calligraphy is rendered automatically at the moment. Looks like the author is doing it manually. I'm guessing automatic rendering is planned, but not sure of that.

View on HN

I'm not so interested in automatic generation of calligraphy for this project, to be honest. I find something meditative about spending a lot of time sweating over laying out these algorithms. It mirrors the struggle I had (we all had, I imagine) while trying to understand them in the first place.

Now I regret wording the title this way. Hope it doesn't confuse too many people.

It's my bad. I'll update the write up soon to be more clear.

Hmm, I see. Do you know if the calligraphy itself could be executed/interpreted? The idea of a visual representation of a program being art but also executable appeals to me.

Ever heard of Piet?

http://www.dangermouse.net/esoteric/piet.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piet_%28programming_language%29

Oh man, that is fantastic. Some of those example programs are really reminiscent of Wireworld.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireworld

A friend of the author of QLB here, and I brought up the idea of a visual interpreter to parse the square kufic calligraphy. My understanding (limited as it is by my almost complete ignorance of Arabic) is that certain stackings of adjacent words would be ambiguous to the parser.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com