Google to pay 60 million euros into French media fund
reuters.com
reuters.com
Title on Reuters: Google to pay 60 million euros into French media fund
Subhead on Reuters: Google... will not pay them for posting links to their content.
Article content says publishers had been pushing for payment for links and snippets, and Google was threatened with legislation to pay for links, but instead settled on this fund to help the publishers make more money using Google's advertising technology (kind of like a $60M version of the $100 AdWords leads.)
Troubles me that informative submission titles are so often elided, while ones suggesting the opposite of the article's intent can be left as is.
Google isn't a charity, time to start remembering that.
I would wait for the details.
Edit: Here they are: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/google-creates-60m-di...
While I disagree in principle with Google having to pay at all, this doesn't seem as bad to me as some kind of revenue share that I was expecting. If it takes a one-time payment to just get this out of the way, that seems less evil.
> Second, Google will deepen our partnership with French publishers to help increase their online revenues using our advertising technology.
This part worries me though because it's ambiguous.
(And here's a smoother-loading version: https://www.readability.com/articles/q8x2ifi3?legacy_bookmar... )
Sure the outcome sucks, but your comment is actually defending a point opposite to the one you intend.
If I were Google I would include a clause demanding positive coverage - seeing as they are paying for the damn news.
I don't agree with the French media co demands but then Google (and Bing) do exploit content in an unfair way, like showing full images on their sites, making a visit to the image creator less likely. Now that people use search engines to find content it's easy to say "block them"...
I am far from understanding the details of this, but it involves channeling money and contracts to Ireland, where taxes are lower. French radio has been revealing that some of these operations are not fully legal.