> From previous threads, I know you don't like rich people
You are mistaken.
> and are personally offended by income inequality
No, just excessive income inequality. There's something wrong with a system that allows one individual to amass more wealth than the bottom 40% of the population combined. That's a broken system that's far too tilted to favor the individual over the society as a whole. I don't have anything against rich people, I have something against the system that allows it to such excess.
Stating my opinion is not attacking, all I said was they could give more, which is a fact. The foundation is required to give 5% a year to avoid most taxes, which seems to be all they give, investing the other 95% to grow the endowment without taking into consideration of the harm that 95% could be bringing to the world...
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-gatesx0...
That strikes me as them being more worried about making money than actually helping people.
> but I guarantee you those masses would not use his money in nearly as useful ways
No you can't, you can only guess.
> But attacking him for how he chooses to fight malaria - it boggles my mind.
You have a strange definition of attacking. I didn't attack them, and I'm not dissing the good they do but it's being blind to not see that they don't do as much as they can, they do as much as the law requires them too. That says something whether you want to see it or not.