Note that while they won't throw her in jail, it will come out of her paycheck, they'll also make her sell a lot of her assets, etc.
Also, ever hear the expression "bad facts make bad law"?
She is not the case you want in front of the supreme court. It isn't about wasting time/money, it's about whether she's going to end up fucking over a lot of people who actually stood a chance of getting ridiculous verdicts overturned. Given her circumstances, there is a significant chance she will be singled out by the supreme court as an example of when 220k for a verdict is okay. It's hard to predict, but instead of helping others and getting a good legal result, she may end up having wasted some RIAA money and fucked over a lot of people. What a great idea!
In short: You are horrendously short sighted, and courts are not a great place to take our your frustrations on an organization you don't like.