Isn't it quite a coincidence that the largest meteor impact since 1908 occurs just hours before the closest fly-by of a large asteroid in 100 years? Yet, NASA claims these two are unrelated.
[1] http://s.telegraph.co.uk/graphics/html/Years/2013/February/i...
True random distributions just work that way. If something that's supposed to happen once in a hundred years is spaced out at roughly 100-year intervals, that's not random.
About '1' apparently.
Otherwise the northern emisphere is in trouble.
I find that coincidence very, very weird too.
And you gotta love all the people saying: "Nothing to see here, move along", as if they had themselves ran all the computation and knew for sure there was no relation between the two events.
http://s.telegraph.co.uk/graphics/html/Years/2013/February/i...
Coincidences do happen once in a while.