Any assistance will be appreciated.
see some samples and discussion on https://github.com/eltiare/carrierwave-vips/issues/9#issuecomment-13685362
The Python colors look a lot different than the original but I see the numbers the same in those two, with the exception of the middle right image, the "5" and the middle bottom, the "15". Each of those in the original is less defined and the 5's look closer to 8's for me (although I can still tell it's a 5).
With the Ruby, every one of your numbers is hazier and harder to read with the exception of the top-left, the "12". However, I believe if given this test, my answers on the Ruby version would only deviate from the original for the middle-right (5), bottom-left (3), and middle-bottom (15).
Also it seems the tan and yellow hues are more accentuated in the Ruby version than the original, but the colors are a lot closer than the Python version.
I can give my review of the other tests if you want but with my color-blindness, I don't believe my opinion is relevant for those.
"(although I can still tell it's a 5)" - that is - on the original? or only the python version? If you are able to see (almost) all numbers on the original, then perhaps your colour-blindness is not as strong? or the test isn't great to start with??
"However, I believe if given this test, my answers on the Ruby version would only deviate from the original...". Deviate meaning you won't be able to tell the difference?
Would it be possible to contact you via email/skype to follow-up on this if necessary?
That's regarding the original. The numbers I see in the original (left->right, top->bottom) are: 12, 8, 6, 29, 57, 5, 3, 15, 74. Is that what you see? They're designed so colorblind people see different numbers sometimes. If that's exactly what you see then the test is either flawed or it's not inclusive of all the frames which test this colorblindness. I have severe color-blindness and take these at the eye-doc regularly. I also read the original color-blindness book in biology class once which is how I know my type.
>"However, I believe if given this test, my answers on the Ruby version would only deviate from the original...". Deviate meaning you won't be able to tell the difference?
Deviate in that on the Ruby version my answers might be: 12, 8, 6, 29, 57, _3_, _8_, _17_, _71_
Feel free to email me: pleasedofeelfreetosendmespam@gmail.com ... yes that's my email :)
Except for the top-left 25, they're all spots for me. The 56 in the middle-right is maybe perceptible to me, but barely.
> If that's exactly what you see then the test is either flawed or it's not inclusive of all the frames which test this colorblindness
Yes - that's what I see, so maybe these samples weren't the best to start with. I took them straight off http://daltonize.appspot.com/ so assumed they are a good starting point...