I saw it too, and thought it was decent. It failed because of the title. Even the most hardcore sci-fi fans don't know what John Carter is.
If the title had "Mars" in it it probably would have at least broken even.
I saw it too, and thought it was decent. It failed because of the title. Even the most hardcore sci-fi fans don't know what John Carter is.
If the title had "Mars" in it it probably would have at least broken even.
It failed because it was "decent" rather than "great" and it cost too much to make to not be great and attract enormous numbers of theater goers. That's half the problem: They place these huge bets on single films and then if one of them doesn't work out they're in big trouble and you see everyone whining and crying about it. They need to learn to make a larger number of smaller bets that each have a higher risk individually but a lower risk collectively, because then a single failure doesn't cost you a hundred million dollars.