Wha?
So they were wrong to give them a warning that they are expected to relocate to an office? They should've just fired them? That's really how you feel?
So they were wrong to give them a warning that they are expected to relocate to an office? They should've just fired them? That's really how you feel?
They have $X in their budget. If the remote employees are producing $Y value, where $Y>$X, then they are earning their keep. But suppose Yahoo believes they can yield 1.5Y for the same $X budget by having on-site workers?
It's not like companies are (or should be) altruistic democracies. I can see why a person affected by this would be sore, but they don't really have a valid gripe IMO. I'm personally a fan of at-will employment.