It has nothing to do with the code of conduct considering that very code says that you are not supposed to take a picture of someone without their express permission.
Where does it say anything about someone's expressed permission? Doing a search on the page for several words did not bring up anything remotely close. Permission isn't even used.
This is the statement being contested:
> that very code says that you are not supposed to take a picture of someone without their express permission.
So, unless you can produce something that says this, it's a lie.
As for this:
> harassing photography or recording
It didn't happen.