Point: She singled out two guys at a conference, provided no evidence/proof while burning them at the stake online, and was fired for it.
edit: That is, what you are saying does not accurately characterise what happened at all, and is also not really a point that follows from your previous post. Like, at least have premises, the application of logical laws, and then a conclusion.
Don't be a dick.
So, you demonstrate (at the very least) sloppy thinking.