If LinkedIn Endorsements Were Honest

cadince.com

9 points·datadriven··6 comments

I'm endorsed for skills I wouldn't even endorse myself in. Incidentally, the folks endorsing me for these skills have never actually worked with me and couldn't tell you whether I could program my way out of a box.

I don't keep an up to date LinkedIn profile, mainly because I haven't found the network extremely useful to me. This has resulted in some languages and tools that I was once pretty familiar with remaining on my profile long after I forgot how to even spell them.

I wonder how well it could work to reduce "endorse-spam" if I could mark someone's endorsement of me as untrustworthy, and then their endorsements of other people could have a lesser weight? Seems like an overly complex solution to a problem that shouldn't exist.

I'd agree with you that it feels like it ought to be a crappy system, but out of curiosity, I just went and checked out my own profile. To my surprise, the "aggregate" of all of my 85 endorsements is fairly accurate. The top 5 are solid, and almost in the same order I'd rank them. There are a few which as you say, I wouldn't endorse myself for; but, only one of them made it to the top ten. I'd say that's not too bad since it a small sample. Maybe they don't need to change anything.

This is the moral equivalent of a single imgur page, just formatted differently. I flagged it.

For some reason I'm connected to this tech recruiter and I noticed the other day that this dude endorsed for pretty much every single technology under the sun.

LinkedIn endorsements are ridiculous.

how about "over promises and under delivers"

also, best linkedIn trolling is endorsing people for languages they despise but have had to use anyway :)

Endorsements are mostly a joke.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com