An A from Nabokov
nybooks.com
nybooks.com
And Nabokov is at least partially right[2] about not needing context if the literature is good. You can pick up Lolita, open to any page and begin reading and I guarantee a smile will flash across your face within three pages.
~~~
[1] Nabokov: "Occasionally I used the little silk mask of an additional pen name in order to deceive this or that captious critic—with most gratifying results ("At last a great writer!" cried my favorite Zoilus in 1939)."
[2] There are huge bodies of work that, if you have context, you will get a LOT more out of, especially older works. Just as TV shows like Family Guy are a series of culturally-dependent in-jokes, so was a lot of the humor in Shakespeare, Chaucer, etc. And reading Li Bai and Du Fu's poetry is not the same unless you know the details of the An Lushan Rebellion they lived through, which had one of the highest death tolls (5.5%–15.3% of entire world population) of any event in history.
So Nabokov either thought that he would use Epstein for his own amusement or (more likely) he would try to secretly develop Epstein's talent without telling him that he likes his writing as too much self confidence can be disastrous for a young writer.
It seems that Epstein was luckier than he imagined. Although, it also seems that Nabokov gave up on him eventually.
This article is decidedly Nabokov-esque: the author feigns ignorance of the connection between describing a movie in perfect detail to Nabokov and then being hired to review movies. It's not a million miles away from the sort of gaff Charles Kinbote might make [1].
Incidentally, I think Pale Fire might appeal to much of the HN crowd. It's frequently read as a dense, finely-wrought mechanical puzzle that might appeal to the coder mindset.
Like Nabokov, I'm also a big fan of writing under pseudonyms. It's a very freeing experience.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Fire
Edit: if you like puzzles, it might be better not to spoil the fun by reading the wikipedia article (or indeed any review, or the dust jacket of the book). It would be better to buy the book, start with the foreword by C. Kinbote and read through to the end of the index.
Having said that though, I highly recommend it to anyone here with even a passing interest in literature. There's a huge corpus of analysis of Pale Fire online, and if you plan to read the novel I highly recommend you simultaneously read one of them. Don't worry too much about spoilers, the beauty of the book is mostly outside of the plot and I think having a guide to help is a benefit to sacrifice for.
It's also perfect for e-readers, because you can just use hyperlinks instead of flipping back and forth between footnotes.
If anyone wants help with it drop me a line :)
Have you read any of Brian Boyd's work? I think you'd really like this: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0691089574/ref=as_li_ss_tl?...
if you like puzzles, it might be better not to spoil the fun by reading the wikipedia article
Yes please. It's absolutely better that way — the most fun book I've ever read. Just pick it up and start reading.
"Leo Tolstoy, Nikolai Gogol, Marcel Proust, James Joyce, Jane Austen, Franz Kafka, Gustave Flaubert, and Robert Louis Stevenson"
Looks like I'll be reading Metamorphosis( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Metamorphosis) tonight!
http://lib.ru/NABOKOW/Inter05.txt
My greatest masterpieces of twentieth century prose are, in this order: Joyce's Ulysses, Kafka's Transformation, Biely's Petersburg, and the first half of Proust's fairy tale In Search of Lost Time.
Now the course comes to a close. The work with this group has been a particularly pleasant association between the fountain of my voice and a garden of ears – some open, others closed, many very receptive, a few merely ornamental, but all of them human and divine.
I did like the way the story paid a sneaky homage to Nabokov (as lenazegher mentions below, or soon to be above), in capturing the dry humour and sly wit which pervade his writing. A lovely little epitaph for a charming writer.
http://dangerousminds.net/comments/a_baboon_of_genius_naboko...
Nabokov's manner on 1950s American TV is delightful, even if he is reading from index cards. "I leave the field of ideas to Dr. Schweitzer and, uh, Dr. Zhivago."