Is Twitter Killing RSS?
jeffnolan.com
jeffnolan.com
Twitter serves a different purpose than blogs, Facebook status updates, etc. If you're shoehorning all your content into all possible channels for attention, well that's just spammy.
But when I follow a regular twitter account I expect short, self-contained tidbits. When people decide to leverage their twitter followers to get traffic to other services, that's what I find annoying.
Even create multiple twitter acounts by topic.
It's a bit of a weird article. He's conflating notification mechanism with social network. What does it mean to kill RSS? Every blogger now uses a tweet widget instead of RSS?
One of my side reasons for reading a ton of RSS feeds was entertainment, getting a feel for what's new and exciting in the world. When I get that information through Twitter in a faster, easier-to-digest form, why would I trawl through RSS feeds? Hence why I don't.
There are still some sites worth checking on a daily or near-daily basis, and I usually just read them in a browser.
However, none of this means the format's dead, just that RSS as a means of information aggregation might be slightly ill.
Twitter AND RSS have taken over more than 50% of my browsing habits, though.
Unread (77)
Of course, this might require consumer-level eye ball tracking to see if you "read" one
I just stumbled up on this too, which is probably a better idea: http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/?p=408
Can you follow hacker news updates on twitter?
The stupid kind of question following stupid hypes.