Windows 8 now up to 3.31% market share as Vista finally falls below the 5% mark
thenextweb.com
thenextweb.com
I need your assistance. I did go ahead an buy a new laptop. I like the machine but am suffering on account of Windows 8!
Still, he'll still show up as Windows 8 in the market share statistics.
Anyways, I like it, so I'll try to explain why. First off, most of my interaction with it is identical to Windows 7. I live in my desktop, just like always. All of my most frequently-used apps are pinned to my taskbar, just like always. The window borders and decorations look a bit different, but the reaction to them is so completely over-the-top that it's hard to believe. The rumors that it's a little snappier than Win7 seem to be true, at least on my machines.
Yes, all the built-in apps have ribbon toolbars. No, this really isn't some kind of existential threat to your ability to use your computer. I hated the shit out of ribbons when they were introduced in Office. They work really well in Explorer, though. I'm not really sure how to describe it, but they manage to keep common actions more accessible than the old menu/toolbar combination did. There are also some small things that I really appreciate, like having a toggle for hidden items on the View ribbon and having both Command Prompt Here and Powershell Here accessible easily via menu and shortcut.
Next, the dreaded Start screen, target of much derision and hatred. My experience with Start menus over the years was that they turned into garbage dumps. Multiple columns of crap in a hierarchical menu where most of the entries were completely useless. MS introduced pinning in XP, and "type to search" in Vista (I think?) to solve that. If you use those, Win8's Start screen is a huge upgrade. If you prefer to hunt through your menus to find apps, you'll be disappointed. I personally don't miss the start menu at all - I have programs pinned on the start screen, sorted left to right by how often I think I'll need them. I can run anything else by typing a few letters of its name, and I honestly don't end up doing that very often.
Metro apps are a mixed bag in terms of usefulness. Part of that is that I have a tablet for the kinds of things that Metro apps are good at, and part is that they just aren't there yet in terms of polish. There are several that I really do like, though. The Netflix app, for some reason, works MUCH better on my laptop than the website. Games are generally a good experience as well - I've played a shameful amount of Jetpack Joyride. The stock Calendar app isn't bad, and it syncs with Google Calendar and pops up notifications for that, which is really cool. I use the stock News, Sports and Weather apps occasionally as well. Metro as a whole needs some more work, but I think it'll get it over the next few years.
Lastly, I'd like to mention that Win8 is probably the most keyboard-friendly OS I've used. My most frequently-used PC is a laptop, and I've always been a heavy keyboard shortcut user to avoid having to use the touchpad. There's keyboard shortcuts for almost everything in Win8. That includes things like managing/resizing Metro apps, moving around the UI on the Start screen, activating buttons on ribbons. If you press Alt in Explorer, the ribbon lights up with hotkeys. They've also added the somewhat famous Win-X shortcut, which pops up a menu with direct access to a lot of tweaking/admin tools. I miss it whenever I'm on an XP/Vista/7 box.
In short, the people who say that it's "unusable" or "crippled" are full of shit. It's a solid evolutionary step up from Win7, with a bunch of superficial changes that are being blown way out of proportion.
The problem is there's a very vocal minority of unfortunately influential people who rail against the start screen and convince others that it's a bigger problem than it really is.
Sure, doing so is rejecting many of the new 'features' of the OS. But once set up it is no less usable than Windows 7.
On my PC it's ok... I uninstalled all metro-apps and installed normal software instead. I just see the start screen as a new kind of start menu. To me it looks just like Windows 7 because I don't spend any time in the new UI environment.
It's strange to most that I admit this, but I really like the Start screen! It gives me a way to have the visual organization I appreciate while I can keep the desktop itself relatively clean for a workflow environment.
On top of all that it's blazing fast and has a ton of features that are great for power-users. So, yeah, I beam happiness with my Windows 8 so you now know of at least one dedicated fan!
Netmarketshare numbers are based on website traffic, and imperfectly reflect sales and the actual installed base.
Still, you should get your client to read this page, and watch the YouTube video: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Windows8ProductivityWhoMovedMy...
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-ww-daily-20130302...
Now get everyone on Windows 7 to upgrade to IE10 then we've practically got an "HTML5" ready web.
The number still seems incredibly small to me. I doubt Windows 8 will even reach 20% by the time Windows 9 comes out in 2 and a half years.
Having a group that abandons logic to promote something's failure naturally creates a counter-movement and therefore a market for blog posts that confirm or deny its success or failure. This has publishers laughing all the way to the bank.
It looks unlikely to develop into the sort of mass conflict that helped publishers make pots of money from Windows vs OS/2, PS3 vs Xbox 360 and similar battles, but it will do.
Obviously whether someone uses Windows 7 or Windows 8 is much more important than rape in India, mass starvation in Africa, war in the Middle East or the fact that the whole planet is melting down. One has to maintain a sense of priorities.
The biggest issue with 8 is that there is enough interface change that people feel they have to relearn it. In business this takes time and money to teach the employees, or for them to learn themselves. Most people don't want to spend time learning something new when there is little to no benefit from doing so. Real computer users want to get a task done, not to spend half their life learning interface changes.
From the tone of your reply, I'm going to assume you are one of those designers that says "My interface is right, and you are too dumb to understand it's awesomeness", and then are shocked and amazed when no one uses it.
If you restrict your attention only to what's going on in the computer industry you are likely to lose your sense of proportion, as well as leading an impoverished life.
Otherwise, my view is that if you don't like Windows 8, carry on using Windows 7, or else install a Stardock or other program that makes it work the way you like. Windows 7 will be around for the rest of the decade at least.
However, people are capable of learning new interfaces, the real issue is the size of the benefits.
With Windows 8, the long term benefits are that the new UI works well with touch screens, it provides access to a new category of WinRT apps, and it gives you much the same UI across mobile phones, tablets, laptops, and desktops (as well as common files and common services). In the long run, this means having to cope with fewer new interfaces, and it reduces your total learning time.
This is obviously a work in progress, and it's a long-term play. None of us knows how it's going to turn out. It's far too soon to say whether it's right or not.
Their tablet OS hardly runs on any tablets. Desktops are no longer the primary computer device and there Windows 8 isn't well loved.
Personally I use Windows 8 on my TV. The first time I set it up I looked for the screen resolution change thing in the Windows 8 style control panel equivalent. It wasn't there, and I ended up having to find it in the ancient and bloated Old School Windows Control Panel. I use Media Center, and that's not Windows 8-ized either. I also hear MS Office doesn't have a Windows 8 version. None of these things, to me, make Windows 8 seem like a massive success.
Microsoft made kick ass phones, desktop OS and tablets in the early 2000s. But that period is over. We have Google and Apple now, Windows is that crappy thing you use at work.
- leverage bias to get easy upvotes on social news sites
- reinforce SEO, imagine being the #2 or #3 google result for 'microsoft' and 'windows 8'
- stay relevant on sites like Google News etc by churning out 'new' 'news'
Saddest part is this crap is probably the best $ per word for the tech news industry after plagiarism.
Windows 7 share is a completely different animal. Big enterprises are still in the middle of rolling out Windows 7, so you should see shifting from XP to 7. Deceleration there is bad news for Microsoft/PCs.
Wikipedia, the 6th most popular web site in the world (according to Alexa), has Windows as less than 58% of the clients hitting it for February 2013 ( http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportOpera... ). Mac/iPhone/iPad is over 30%, Linux (Android, Ubuntu etc.) is over 7%.
The rise of iOS and Android is the real breaking news story in my book. Windows controls its form factor niche, but that becomes more irrelevant every day. Boasting of Windows 90+% share of the desktop would be like DEC boasting of its market share of minicomputers in the 1970s/1980s.
Windows 7 64 bit 55.11% -0.37%
Windows 7 13.40% -0.43%
Windows 8 64 bit 9.92% +1.03%
Windows XP 32 bit 8.35% -0.62%
Windows Vista 64 bit 3.87% +0.57%
Windows Vista 32 bit 2.72% +0.18%
MacOS 10.8.2 64 bit 1.68% -0.03%
MacOS 10.7.5 64 bit 0.82% +0.08%
Windows 8 0.75% +0.01%
MacOS 10.6.8 64 bit 0.64% +0.02%
- Steam supports MacOS, but the title selection is somewhere between "very poor" and "nonexistent". You will see a dramatic under reporting of OSX usage numbers compared to the actual market.
- Most games no longer support WinXP, so any regular Steam user would have been forced to upgrade to at least Win7 long ago just to maintain compatibility. You will also see a dramatic under-reporting of XP numbers here.
"Steam users" is not a representative selection of "PC market".
Are so many gamers still using ancient hardware incapable of running Windows 7 or 8? Or are they unwilling or afraid to upgrade?
At least, XP usage has dropped by 0.62 percentage points since the month before. Since this rate will likely decrease, XP will not be gone in less than 14 months.
I'm sure there's a lot of people that run Boot Camp and boot into XP just for games and see no reason to pay for an upgrade to Windows 7.
I honestly have no idea what's going to take for XP usage to drop substantially. I can only wonder whether this will lead to an IE6-like problem in the future.