If you look at many of the plans already offered by ISP's, you'll find that this isn't the case.[1]
Once more homes are connected, these limits are only likely to increase (as they have each year prior). Perhaps we shouldn't have limits at all, and just pay for a pipe of a certain bandwidth; but from an ISP's perspective they implement these caps to protect themselves from abuse by a small % of users.
Personally I'd rather know my cap is there, as opposed to the odd behavior of many US ISPs in targeting "high usage" users with what seems like little transparency.
The largest plan offered by iiNet has a quota of 1000GB. If you're on the 100Mbps plan, this can be consumed in less than 1 day. How is this not the case?
For the present time, 1TB is enough for almost all home users.
As history has shown us, these limits will increase as demand does.
And iiNet overage at $0.10/GB is pretty favourable as well… what does AWS charge again?
I would if I could…
> And iiNet overage at $0.10/GB is pretty favourable as well…
Well, I suppose it's reasonable. I don't think it's fair to compare it to business-grade services like AWS though; it would be more appropriate to compare the NBN to Google Fiber or one of the Japanese/Korean ISPs.
Healthcare, education, safety are very high on the list of things you should be thankful for, and are high on the list of reasons I'll be coming back (at some point)