The reluctant Twitterer's dilemma
slate.com
slate.com
It's interesting to see people filtering for keywords and just automatically following you if you use those words (surely in an attempt to gain followers). After the first post where I mentioned Ubuntu, I suddenly had a spike in followers, but all of them were following thousands of people and have never tweeted back to me.
I've tried using it as a "microblogging" tool, and to be frank it helped me realise I was pretty boring. If you have a super-duper interesting life (e.g. if you're Stephen Fry) then sure, otherwise I feel that it, combined with search and hashtags, has much more potential for people to discuss things publically.
But wait! It doesn't look like that dude will absolve me for not being on Facebook - oh well, I'll just have to learn to live with my moral miasma.
Thus, the successful media tap into an unfulfilled need, and meet that need well.
So, should you use Twitter? Yes, if you have something to accomplish that Twitter helps you accomplish. Otherwise, no.
(And the real answer to all those hordes of people asking, "I have a blog; what should I write about?" is "If you have nothing to say, then you don't need a blog.")
Other than that, I've been rather reluctant......it seems like a great way to prevent companies or public figures from writing 'TLDR' posts - but why would you want to TLDR your own friends?