Thanks for posting. I would have thought narrow lines would produce the problem that those specific lines would become unavailable for study, or would be freely mixed with the "real" data in confusing ways. It didn't occur to me that they could simply be subtracted in a deterministic way.

On that basis, I might have argued for high pressure sodium (to smear the lines) instead of low pressure, and I would have been quite wrong.

Given these issues, it's no wonder that a mountaintop in Hawaii, and another one in the Atacama desert, are now the preferred locations for optical astronomy.