I'm curious about this whole "have to be contrarian deal." Guy writes blog post which is good advice in 99% of the situations and someone just has to bring up that, yeah, somewhere, sometimes more logging is not necessarily better. Why always nitpick on things?

In my work, if people wrote more and better log messages I would be delighted. They almost never do and instead rely on the Visual Studio debugger to inspect program state. It works great when debugging your own code, but is pretty useless when debugging someone elses code (you dont know where to place the breakpoints) or when analyzing a crash on a production site.