Yeah, some of the militias aren't interested in democracy, and some are funded by external powers that have various interests in Syria. It's still a civil war.
Yeah, some of the militias aren't interested in democracy, and some are funded by external powers that have various interests in Syria. It's still a civil war.
As you can see the prove in my other comments, Free Syrian Army was established by a NATO sponsored Libyan terrorist. As you can see in their videos, these fucking terrorists don't even speak the Syrian dialect of Arabic.
We are talking about a global terrorist organization and huge manipulations made by NATO countries to legalize this terrorism.
Please go to do some research.
I'm not saying syria is or isn't one, but you got me thinking about how a civil war could very well be labeled terrorism and vice versa depending on the spin you wanted to put on it.
Incorrect: this is an external destablisation by NATO, Qatar et al. & a heroic defence by the Syrian people.
Who is training, funding & supporting the death squads in Syria? NATO, under the supervision of Robert Stephen Ford:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-salvador-option-for-syria-u...
Negroponte/Ford were resposible for running the death squads in central America in the 80's & Iraq in 2004 onwards.
If Mexico & Canada were sending snipers to the US & some libertarians joined in - would you call that a civil war?