Sign up for the SICP Blitz in London happening in June
docs.google.com
docs.google.com
"[We will be] completing 3 exercises from each chapter of SICP over 6 weeks, one chapter a week after the kickoff."
Firstly, my edition and the linked edition only have 5 chapters. Secondly, it's unclear if it means those 5 sections as the chapters, or the smaller subsections (1.1, 1.2, etc).
If they mean the big chapters, then this seems way, way, too fast (with not enough exercises), and if it's the subsections then it still seems like too few exercises.
I've been doing one subchapter each week, completing at least half the exercises in each section. It's been a pretty good pace, I think, and I'd probably recommend it to people with similar amounts of free time to me. I'm coming from a maths background and have no previous CompSci experience (save a tiny bit of Python).
Basically, I'm interested in organizing something similar in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada and I'm interested in other organizer's experience with this.
This is what I don't get: this appears to be a self-study group, targeted at hacker-type personalities who want to expand their minds. BUT on the other hand, you're restricting it to an elite audience by turning the signup form into a job interview.
This does not strike me as sensible.
The only way I can see that it is really tasteless is if it refers to the Sweet hit of the early 70s:
Not at all. Like others have said, its common meaning is understood to be something else anyway. Nearly no one I've met is touchy about it, if any. As a society/culture in general it's not the kind of thing we get worked up about. We make jokes about it. We see it as a sign of our spirit as a nation. If it had been something more recent, then people might be offended a little - but this was quite a time ago. Most of the people alive here were born after it happened or were too young to remember it.
e.g we need to blitz the sink - we need to clean it thoroughly and/or quickly.