Hacker News Reader

Only change seems to be a reference to the W3C Web Cryptography Working Group. Which is a bit funny, since that's who pushed the draft referenced in the HN thread I linked (the one I said was horribly broken).

Edit: Magikarp is correct, there are several other changes. I'll annotate my post as needed. Done.

View on HN

There are actually other changes. I recommend you re-read the post.

Edit: Thank you for re-reading! :-)

Is there any chance you'd be willing to throw up the original post somewhere? It'd be nice to have along side my points for comparison purposes, just because it's changed so much. If not, that's cool.

I don't think I have it anymore. I didn't save a copy.

Well, the wayback machine is your friend. http://web.archive.org/web/20111001124736/http://log.nadim.c...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com