Double Robotics has started shipping its iPad-equipped telepresence robots | Hacker News Reader

Double Robotics has started shipping its iPad-equipped telepresence robots

venturebeat.com

20 pointsjohnkoetsier6 comments

We are probably the biggest user of a Double being the first to get beta access and having a co-founders (drolnitzky) remote. At one point early in the beta, we were bigger user than every other user combined.

Having a double has been one of the best boons to our productivity. I personally spend most of my team working with drolnitzky and this is the best thing that has happened to me professionally. It's like having him in the same room. The meetings are much easier, discussion is impromptu, asking a question doesn't require getting on skype, asking for permission etc.

Double is one of those things that you think you don't need but if you have remote team members, it becomes the most indispensable tool.

I can't say enough good things about Double. It's an amazing amazing thing.

I wonder - why not to make an empty plastic shell similar to a human in form? Uncanny valley? Similarly, why now to make empty heads - possibly custom-made, for each person who's going to use the robot?

unnecessary cost and unnecessary reduction in space efficiency / maneuverability?

I tried that in an early version of Anybots (see http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/09/anybots-rolls-out-qa-the-... for pictures). It caused people to expect it to be a Robot with a robotic personality, and were disappointed when it was just a proxy for a person. It was confusing since there were two human-like things involved. I analogized it to designing a phone to look like a human head.

The goal is communicating transparently with the remote person, so a minimal design works best.

That said, a humanoid torso would be a fun aftermarket accessory for the Double.

May be it's a design question. The torso shouldn't be human-like, but the idea is to make it - less ugly, subjectively? - than a stick with an iPad on it. Yes, it somehow should avoid being confused with robot - so may be it shouldn't look like a stereotypical robot.

I agree that everything has a price; the question is, is it justified by perceived improvement in looks. To me, a Segway with a stick looks odd, especially in a company of a few people walking somewhere. Something more resembling "a figure" could likely improve the perception.

A head model could both make easier to realize who you're talking to - I guess this can be useful - and also improve overall looking. I agree that it's also not as easy - and reconfigurable - as just having an iPad.

It seems to me there is a potential for improvements.

Could the concept really be less creepy? encapsulate the double inside a blow-up doll? :)

(I, for one, welcome our new cybernetic overlords.)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com