Flagged for utter nonsense.
Author doesn't know what he's talking about, much less what he's measuring. Submitter put link-bait title that is not even related to the article.
How did this get voted up?
Author doesn't know what he's talking about, much less what he's measuring. Submitter put link-bait title that is not even related to the article.
How did this get voted up?
Furthermore whatever he is measuring, it is neither tokyo tyrant nor memcache. Memcached doesn't break a sweat doing upwards of 10k ops/sec on moderate hardware, especially when all you're doing is increments. He managed to get 2000/sec out of it.
So again, whatever he's measuring, it's not the "performance of key/value stores". Both the article-title and the linkbait HN title are wrong.