You can also export these collections and share them with other team members.
This is particularly useful for sanity checking before deploys e.g. just running through each API call to make sure users can login and perform primary actions.
Websecurify looks interesting in itself but requires "access to your data on all websites" permission which means doing a load of research into what it's actually doing etc etc which seems like a lot of effort just to try out a rest client.
Best of luck to them though, Postman made by workflow testing API's hugely more efficient so if they manage to improve on that it'll be a great tool.
I mean, if I have to fill a full request myself, I'd better directly use a terminal.
Right now, POSTMAN fills all my needs, and the alternative will have to be really good to make me change.
Maybe people not aware of postman would appreciate more.
I'd be really interested to hear more about why the dependency is there and what the interplay between the two extensions and the cloud bit of the service is?
It is worth mentioning though that the link points to a hosted app - not an extension. You do require an extension for this to work but it is very lightweight and rather simple. The extension only provides the ability to send HTTP requests as you see them.