Hacker News Reader

Comment by zackattack | Hacker News Reader

Anyone else think he was valuing his time too highly?

If you think you can add 1mm to the value of your startup by working 12 hours a day 7 days a week for a year, then your time is "worth" $230/hour.

Also, considering what someone with a similar background could earn working full time for an established company (especially factoring in benefits), $50/hr is fairly conservative in terms of opportunity cost.

Opportunity cost != time valuation

Why not?

Because the VC is not paying you at a market rate for what your time could be. They are funding you because they think you will be successful. If you are successful, your ultimate outcome will be a multiple of your "market rate" over three years. Therefore, your hourly rate should be reduced.

I can not follow your logic. I never had VC investment, but I did not even think the VCs pay you. Even if they did, wouldn't you access your value by the expected outcome P(failure)0+P(success)10 billions?

It also doesn't matter, because I still think the opportunity cost equation holds. If you decide now to become a waiter instead of an IT consultant, it costs you 70$ an hour to be a waiter (assuming waiters earn 10$/h and consultants 80$/h). I don't think there is a way around that.

It seemed rather low to me. If a "startup worker" is x times more productive than a normal employee, wouldn't it also make sense to value his time x times higher?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com